![\"\"](\"https:\/\/substackcdn.com\/image\/fetch\/$s_!K8Un!,w_424,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep\/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2d8d054f-5403-486c-a660-f6e3bd0e7245_1280x1209.jpeg)
<\/picture><\/div>You\u2019re putting in the work. You\u2019ve updated your profile, you show up to dates, you\u2019ve read enough about attachment theory to teach a class. And yet here you are, still looking.<\/span><\/p>\n The problem probably isn\u2019t you. It\u2019s where you\u2019re putting the effort.<\/span><\/p>\n Most dating advice is about presentation: How you look, what you say, how you come across. <\/span><\/p>\n Very little of it addresses the structural questions: How many new people are actually entering your life each week? Are you visible enough for the right person to find you? Are you staying in relationships past the point where you already knew? Are you protecting yourself from embarrassments so small they don\u2019t deserve protecting against?<\/span><\/p>\n These are the questions that actually determine outcomes, that most people never think to ask.<\/span><\/p>\n The people who find great relationships fastest are usually not the most attractive, the most interesting, or the most emotionally evolved. They\u2019re the ones who understood something structural about dating that everyone else is too busy optimizing the wrong things to notice.<\/span><\/p>\n You don\u2019t want to date hundreds of people. No one wants to casually date forever. What you really want is to date \u201cyour person\u201d who\u2019s for you next, get off the apps, and never date again. That search for \u201cthe one\u201d can encourage people to try to be a bit too perfect and precise. They wait too long, they overscreen and filter out potential partners too stringently. Their vetting process is thorough and they treat every first date like a high stakes interview.<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s the thing: Is your filter really that good? Is your discernment calibrated that well?<\/span><\/p>\n Probably not. The best way to improve your filtering ability is with reps, not reflection. You can\u2019t think your way to expertise. You can\u2019t calibrate what you want from someone by thinking harder about it. You calibrate it by dating badly a few times and noticing what breaks things.<\/span><\/p>\n You need to date more initially, to date less in the long run.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Trying to be too finely tuned and too perfect from the start makes everything take longer.<\/span><\/p>\n Want the tools, frameworks, and step-by-step strategies that make the real difference between understanding something and being able to do something with it?<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s what paid subscribers get, plus access to the full archive (everything unlocked) of science-backed scripts, exercises, and coaching frameworks from 4+ years of working with real people in real relationships.<\/span><\/p>\n Less than a therapy co-pay. Infinitely more actionable.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Most dating advice focuses on how you show up: your profile, your photos, your opening line, what you say on the date. Almost nobody thinks structurally about the raw number of new people they\u2019re physically near each week. That number, for most people, is embarrassingly low. We\u2019re creatures of habit, so our worlds are actually quite small. Same friends, same neighborhood, same grocery store, gym, coffee shop, all at the same times on the same days. Not to mention we get on the same apps, with the same pictures, and same profile, ironically hoping for different results. The number of people in your orbit is a hidden bottleneck.<\/span><\/p>\n The fix isn\u2019t going to more singles events. It\u2019s re-engineering your routines to leverage proximity. Mix up your patterns. Go to some of your same places, on different days or at different times. Go to different places altogether. Join a running club, a ceramics class, a monthly comedy night you actually commit to. Not because any individual person there is your person, but because you need to be near new people repeatedly, not just occasionally.<\/span><\/p>\n Real relationships grow from accumulated familiarity, <\/span><\/p>\n not a single charged encounter.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Imagine being at a wedding, and the bride and groom turn to you and, in front of everyone, thank you for helping bring them together. Goosebumps. Who wouldn\u2019t want to play a role in getting two people together? No one. That\u2019s why you have to put that energy out into the world more.<\/span><\/p>\n It\u2019s as simple as saying, <\/span>\u201cI\u2019m genuinely open to being set up if you think of anyone.\u201d<\/span><\/em> It\u2019s not awkward. It\u2019s a compliment. You\u2019re telling that person that you trust their judgment and think they know great people. They\u2019ll be flattered, and then they\u2019ll immediately get to work.<\/span><\/p>\n Don\u2019t just rely on your close friends. It\u2019s tough for them because you know the same people. Instead, the real opportunity is with casual acquaintances. Your college roommate\u2019s coworker. The woman from your gym. The person you met at a wedding two years ago and connected with on Instagram. Their networks are completely different and full of people you\u2019d never encounter on your own.<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s wonderful, but for your online dating profile or a first date, it\u2019s terrible. Here\u2019s why: Everyone loves to travel. Because you appeal to everyone, you capture the attention of no one.<\/span><\/p>\n The same goes for loving your family, being adventurous, foodie, hiking, wine lover, brunch, beach, fitness, yoga, dog mom,\u2026you get the idea. The same goes for cute phrases like, \u201cWorks hard, plays harder.\u201d (Just don\u2019t).<\/span><\/p>\n Potential partners really all of this the same way: I don\u2019t need to meet you because I already know you (and have met someone just like you before). These descriptions make you boring. You\u2019re not boring.<\/span><\/p>\n The people who are most captivating are specific. They stick out, they\u2019re hard to forget. Quirkiness gives you an advantage. Not in a weird way, but show what makes you stand out. The corporate lawyer who competes in powerlifting. The grandma who also kite-surfs. The former CIA agent who\u2019s also a dancer. The teacher who spent a year in rural Japan and came back with a ceramics obsession.<\/span><\/p>\n The details don\u2019t have to be dramatic. They have to be real, and distinct enough that the right person reads them and thinks: Huh\u2026that\u2019s someone I need to meet.<\/span><\/p>\n Bonus: Make sure the way you describe yourself will sound unappealing to some people. That means the people who aren\u2019t for you, aren\u2019t wasting your time.<\/span><\/p>\n As humans, we\u2019re highly sensitized to even the smallest embarrassments. Ever had this happen? At a restaurant, your server brings your food and says, \u201cEnjoy your meal.\u201d And you respond, \u201cYou too.\u201d Just me? Cool. I still think about it.<\/span><\/p>\n In dating, we fiercely protect ourselves from the embarrassment of rejection, looking too eager, seeming needy, or saying too much too soon. Though it sounds natural and harmless, these concerns hold the relationship back. You might not send a text, talk to someone at a party, make eye contact and say \u201chey\u201d to a cute stranger, flirt enough, or show someone how much you\u2019re actually interested. That\u2019s a lot of inaction and playing small.<\/span><\/p>\n Look at the consequences. Sending the text costs almost nothing. Not sending it costs a potential relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n Saying you\u2019re looking for something real on date two, might be a little awkward if they\u2019re not on the same page. Not saying it costs months of slow-burn situationship ambiguity that ends in the same place anyway.<\/span><\/p>\n The downside of being direct is almost always smaller than it feels in the moment. The upside is that you stop wasting time with people who aren\u2019t actually on board. What reads as risk is usually just discomfort. Unfortunately we prioritize immediate discomfort much more heavily than potential long-term pain.<\/span><\/p>\n Anyone can show up well when they\u2019re trying. First dates, special occasions, moments when the stakes feel obvious (e.g., meeting the friends). Even the world\u2019s worst partners know to show up then. They can fake it long enough to get by. But, that\u2019s not actually where you learn much about a person.<\/span><\/p>\n You should really pay more attention in the low-stakes moments. How someone talks about their ex when they\u2019re relaxed and not still managing impressions. How they treat a server on a Thursday night when they\u2019re tired after a long day at work. Whether they\u2019re curious about your day or mostly waiting to talk about theirs. These aren\u2019t small things. They\u2019re some of the best data you have about long-term relationship potential. Relationships have some big moments, but mostly consist of the mundane. Partner have to be great then too.<\/span><\/p>\n Tyler spent two years in a relationship they struggled to make work, which ultimately fell apart. Chris had five relationships over the same two years.<\/span><\/p>\n Which one sounds like the worse situation? Which person will have learned more about love? The fact is, five sequential one-year relationships will likely teach you more, and cost you less, than one five-year dead-end relationship with a ceiling (that you probably should have seen from the start).<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cGood enough\u201d relationships are a trap.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n That\u2019s easy to understand in theory, but hard to put into practice. Leaving a relationship feels like failure. It\u2019s even more difficult if the relationship isn\u2019t terrible, but merely \u201cgood enough.\u201d (<\/span>Those relationships are a trap.<\/span>) Starting over feels expensive. So people succumb to inertia and continue on, staying past the point where it would have been easier to leave. Defaulting to complacency is easier than making difficult decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n Now, you shouldn\u2019t jump from relationship to relationship for the fun of it. But, if you\u2019re not finding what you\u2019re looking for, it may be time to look elsewhere instead of hoping your partner or the situations miraculously changes. Check-in with yourself periodically: Is this relationship still headed in the right direction? Not \u201cis this perfect\u201d (it won\u2019t be), but is this really what I want? You want to thrive, not just survive.<\/span><\/p>\n Hope this helps,<\/span><\/p>\n Dr. L<\/span><\/p>\n If this helped, a like, share, or restack helps more people find it.<\/span><\/p>\n Have a comment? Please share. I read every one.<\/span><\/p>\n\n