\n<\/p>\n
On Monday, the company announced the open-source Treblo AI Music Classifier, which detects when a song was generated using Treblo, though not other AI tools. According to a blog post, it has a false positive rate of less than 1 in 10,000. That\u2019s not unimpeachable, but it\u2019s notable that the company\u2019s own Classifier determined that \u201cRubberz\u201d was \u201cvery likely Treblo\u201d with \u201chigh confidence,\u201d adding more fuel to the PR nightmare for Fenix.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Treblo does seem to be relishing the attention a bit. \u201cThe classifier returns a very high probability score for Rubberz, indicating the released audio was generated almost entirely by our model. That would make it the first known AI-generated song to reach the Billboard Hot 100,\u201d CEO Ryan Tremblay said in a statement to The Verge<\/em>. He continued, \u201cSomeone appears to have used our model to find a sound that millions of people connected with and that\u2019s exciting.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Fenix has continued to deny that Rubberz was made using AI, and has posted clips of what he claims are the project files of the recording session. However, those low-quality videos have done little to dispel any allegations of the song being AI-generated. According to Stereogum<\/em>, Medasin contended in a since-expired Instagram story that Fenix clearly just used an AI stem separator to fake the session.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Fenix did not immediately return a request for comment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n